meinGPT and CompanyGPT TL;DR: two German enterprise AI products with very different commercial models and target customers. meinGPT (Munich-based startup) sells a fixed-price 90-day pilot at EUR 10,000-20,000 that includes employee training, M365/SAP/Google Workspace integration, and ISO 27001 + BSI-C5 hosting on Telekom infrastructure. After the pilot, customers can continue with an enterprise contract. CompanyGPT (innFactory consulting) is built on LibreChat open source and installs into the customer's own Azure tenant, with companyRAG for SharePoint, companyFILES for Office editing, companyTRANSLATE for GDPR-compliant translation, and multi-LLM routing across Azure OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, and Gemini. Pricing scales to EUR 66,000-144,000 in year 1 for 200 users (one-time setup plus annual cloud, token, and managed service costs).
Both are German, both DSGVO-compliant, both serve regulated-industry buyers. The decision between them and Teamo AI, LangDock, or Mistral Le Chat Enterprise depends on your buying brief specifics. For the broader market view, see our EU ChatGPT alternative for enterprise comparison.
What meinGPT Is
meinGPT is a Munich-based startup that positions on a holistic-transformation-partnership commercial model rather than pure SaaS. The 90-day pilot at EUR 10,000-20,000 includes platform deployment, employee training (typically 2-day workshops for power users plus self-service onboarding for the broader team), Microsoft 365, SAP, and Google Workspace integration, and ISO 27001 + BSI-C5 hosting on Telekom Open Cloud. Customers report higher initial adoption rates than self-serve SaaS competitors because the bundled training closes the AI-literacy gap that often blocks productivity uplift.
The trade-off: less flexibility for ongoing iteration than pure-SaaS competitors. After the 90-day pilot, customers continue with an enterprise contract or migrate elsewhere. The pricing for the continuation phase is quote-only and depends on user count and usage. The product is a strong fit for organizations that explicitly need a hand-held pilot phase with bundled training, less strong for organizations with internal AI ops capacity that want pure platform access. meinGPT is GDPR-compliant by default, hosts data on BSI-C5-certified Telekom servers, and offers a written DPA under EU jurisdiction. The structural trade-off in the bundled-pilot model: training is locked to the vendor's content and their fixed connector catalog at pilot time. Teamo AI's AI integration assistant discovers all tools from any documented API in 5 minutes, so post-pilot integration growth happens via chat command rather than through a vendor consulting engagement. For organizations that expect their integration needs to evolve after the pilot phase, the runtime architecture of Teamo AI compounds where meinGPT's bundled-pilot model does not. See our integrations without IT tickets deep-dive.
What CompanyGPT Is
CompanyGPT is a managed enterprise product from innFactory (a German AI consulting firm) that installs into the customer's own Azure tenant rather than running on shared infrastructure. The product is built on LibreChat open source plus innFactory's proprietary additions: companyRAG for SharePoint document retrieval, companyFILES for in-place Office editing, companyTRANSLATE for GDPR-compliant translation across 30+ languages, and multi-LLM routing that switches between Azure OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, and Gemini based on task and policy. The own-tenant model means no shared hosting, no multi-tenant infrastructure, no minimum user counts for data sovereignty.
The trade-off: significantly higher cost and complexity. CompanyGPT pricing for 200 users typically lands at EUR 30,000-60,000 for one-time platform setup, EUR 6,000-18,000 annually for cloud infrastructure (Azure costs), EUR 12,000-30,000 annually for model token costs, and EUR 18,000-36,000 annually for managed service. Year-1 total: EUR 66,000-144,000. Year-2 onward: EUR 36,000-84,000. This puts CompanyGPT in the enterprise tier, comparable to Mistral Le Chat Enterprise in cost and complexity. Best fit for regulated-industry organizations (banking, defense, healthcare, public sector) that mandate own-tenant deployment and have the procurement budget.
meinGPT vs CompanyGPT Side-by-Side
| Criterion | meinGPT (Munich) | CompanyGPT (innFactory) |
|---|---|---|
Commercial model | Fixed-price 90-day pilot + enterprise continuation | Customer's own Azure tenant + managed service |
Hosting infrastructure | Telekom Open Cloud (BSI-C5 + ISO 27001) | Customer's own Azure tenant (sovereignty by design) |
Pricing tier | EUR 10K-20K for 90-day pilot, continuation quote-only | EUR 66K-144K year 1 for 200 users; EUR 36K-84K year 2+ |
Setup time | 4-6 weeks (includes training rollout) | 4-8 weeks (own-tenant deployment + config) |
Models supported | Multi (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) | Azure OpenAI + Claude + Gemini |
Native channels | web only | web only |
Office integration | M365 + SAP + Google Workspace bundled | Native SharePoint RAG + companyFILES in-place editing |
Best fit | Mid-sized orgs wanting hand-held pilot phase with bundled training | Regulated-industry orgs needing own-tenant deployment with budget |
Neither is a fit for most mid-sized DACH organizations. meinGPT's pilot price is reasonable, but the continuation pricing pushes into Mittelstand-uncomfortable territory. CompanyGPT's year-1 cost is firmly in Large Enterprise tier. Both are designed for buyers with explicit-mandate budgets (training-bundled pilot or own-tenant sovereignty). For the typical mid-market buying brief, Teamo AI, LangDock, or DeutschlandGPT deliver the same DSGVO posture at 10-20 percent of the cost.
Who Fits meinGPT vs CompanyGPT vs Alternatives
Pick meinGPT if your buying brief explicitly requires a hand-held pilot phase with bundled employee training. Typical fit: 100-500 employee mid-sized companies with low internal AI-literacy and budget for a guided onboarding ('we know we need AI but our team is not ready'). The 90-day pilot model lowers the early failure risk and accelerates initial adoption. After the pilot, evaluate continuation pricing carefully against pure-SaaS alternatives.
Pick CompanyGPT if your compliance brief mandates own-tenant deployment (no shared infrastructure) and you have enterprise budget. Typical fit: regulated industries (banking, defense, healthcare, public sector), or organizations with explicit sovereignty-mandate procurement frameworks. The own-Azure-tenant model is structurally distinct from all multi-tenant competitors, including Teamo AI and LangDock. For 200+ user deployments with strict tenant-isolation requirements, CompanyGPT is the most direct German option besides Aleph Alpha PhariaAssistant.
Pick alternatives if neither buying brief applies. For mid-sized DACH organizations with normal compliance posture, Teamo AI (EUR 790-1,250/month for 50 users, native WhatsApp/Signal, team-context-aware) or LangDock (EUR 1,150-1,450/month for 50 users, 40+ models) deliver the same DSGVO compliance at 10-20 percent of CompanyGPT's cost. For BSI-C5-specific mandates, DeutschlandGPT covers it without the meinGPT pilot wrapper.
Confirm the right vendor tier in 7 minutes
AI governance assessment scores your buying brief against the vendor tiers. Saves the meinGPT pilot fee or CompanyGPT enterprise budget if a mid-market vendor matches your actual brief.
Two German enterprise products, two specific buyer profiles
meinGPT and CompanyGPT are real options for real buyers, but they are not interchangeable. meinGPT optimizes for hand-held pilot phases with bundled training. CompanyGPT optimizes for own-tenant sovereignty at enterprise budget.
Most mid-sized DACH buyers are not in either target segment. The right comparison is Teamo AI vs LangDock vs DeutschlandGPT for the typical EUR 1,000-1,500/month for 50 users buying brief, not meinGPT vs CompanyGPT.
The decision sequence: first confirm your buying brief tier with the AI Governance Assessment, then shortlist within the right tier, then run vendor pilots. Mid-tier buyers should not be on Mistral/CompanyGPT pitches, enterprise buyers should not be on Teamo/LangDock pitches.



![Teamo AI vs LangDock: The Head-to-Head Verdict [2026]](https://www.teamazing.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/teamo-ai-vs-langdock-comparison.jpg)
![How to Migrate from ChatGPT to EU AI in 30 Days [2026]](https://www.teamazing.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/chatgpt-to-eu-ai-migration-guide.jpg)
![LangDock Enterprise Review [2026]: Honest 90-Day Assessment](https://www.teamazing.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/langdock-enterprise-review.jpg)